💥 FATHERS PAY, GOVERNMENT REIGNS, FAMILY LOSES 💥

The “Supporting Healthy Pregnancy Act” Explained

So here’s the latest from Iowa: Rep. Ashley Hinson wants dads to fork over AT LEAST 50% of pregnancy medical costs if the mother requests it. Sounds fair? Buckle up. This one’s a doozy.

---

💸 YOU PAY… YOU DON’T PLAY

Fathers get the checkbook, that’s it. No voice. No custody rights. No say in medical decisions.
🛑 Financially liable ✅ Legally powerless ❌

Meanwhile, the mother—and the government enforcing the bill—calls the shots. Congrats, Dad: You are the world’s first legally mandated ATM.

---

💍 MARRIED? YOU’RE ALREADY ON THE HOOK

If you’re hitched, the law is basically:

“Thanks for being married… oh, and by the way, we might make you pay extra anyway.”

This isn’t pro-family. It’s about non-marital pregnancies, where the state swoops in after the fact instead of encouraging commitment before the fact.

---

⚖️ ASYMMETRY GALORE

Picture this:

1. Woman A gets pregnant with Man A.

2. Woman A demands he pay expenses.

3. Woman A moves on to Man B.

Man A? Legally bound to pay, no recourse, no control.
Meanwhile, the government acts as referee, accountant, and enforcer.
And “reasonable expenses”? Totally undefined. Dads are left guessing how much cash to hand over.

---

🏛️ GOVERNMENT AS SURROGATE SPOUSE

Instead of promoting pair-bonding and shared responsibility, the law whispers:

“Why bother with commitment when Uncle Sam will cover your back?”

💡 The real lesson: this bill encourages women to marry the government, not a man. The actual father? Left holding the bag.

---

🌱 THE TRUE PRO-FAMILY SOLUTION

A genuinely pro-family approach would:

• ✅ Reward commitment before conception

• ✅ Encourage women to select responsible partners

• ✅ Keep the state out of the bedroom… and the checkbook

Society—not the government—should foster mutual responsibility, foresight, and healthy pair-bonding. That’s the only way to avoid turning fathers into financial automatons.

---

⚠️ BOTTOM LINE

The Iowa bill looks shiny on paper, but it’s really:

• 💀 Asymmetrical

• 💀 Vague

• 💀 Government overreach disguised as “family support”

Real pro-family action? Encourage commitment, reward responsibility, and leave the state out of the bedroom.

💥 ULTRA EXTREME ULTRA ABSURD POCKET-FOB EDITION CHECKLIST™ 💥

• 💸 Dad = ATM: Pays AT LEAST 50% ✅, gets ZERO rights ❌

  💍 Marriage? Already paying… now maybe pay extra anyway!

  ⚖️ Asymmetry Alert: Woman can move on. Dad still pays. Govt enforces.

  🕵️‍♂️ “Reasonable” Expenses?” Mystery box: guess & pay. 🎲

  🏛️ State = Surrogate Spouse: Uncle Sam > Father.

  🌱 True Pro-Family? Reward commitment BEFORE conception. Encourage mutual responsibility.

  💀 Bottom Line: Asymmetry ✅ Vague ✅ Govt Overreach ✅

  🔥 Women, know your worth. Men, demand mutual respect. No checkbook marriages. 💪